Meta Shifts the Blame + Do Data Center Bans Work? + The Final HatGPT
This week, Meta agreed to pay up to $17.1 billion and make major changes to Facebook and Instagram over claims it endangered children with addictive social media platforms. We discuss why it capitulated and what it means for the entire social media industry. Then, Princeton computer science professor Arvind Narayanan returns to offer his thoughts on why banning data centers won’t slow down A.I. progress. And finally, it’s all hats on deck for the final HatGPT.
Guests:
- Arvind Narayanan, professor of computer science at Princeton, and co-author of the “A.I. as Normal Technology” newsletter.
Additional Reading:
- Meta to Pay Up to $17.1 Billion in Landmark Settlement Over Social Media Addiction Claims
- Mark Zuckerberg Wants to Make Sure His Competitors Share His Pain
- Arvind Narayanan’s Post About A.I. Data Centers
- Apple Vision Pro in Surgery: A New Paper
- Rockstar Finally Breaks Its Silence Over The GTA 6 Leaks, Calls Them ‘Heartbreaking’
- Amazon Delivery Drone Dumps Texas Woman’s Parcel Straight Into Her Swimming Pool
- What if Your Texts Traveled as Slowly as a Carrier Pigeon?
- A.I. Agents Are Turning Founders Into Insomniacs
- What is a ‘Meat Proxy’? The New Term For Coworkers Who Blindly Share A.I. Output
- Chinese Robot Tiangong Clocks Sub-9 second 100 Metres in Beijing
- Inside OpenAI’s Reboot
Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
- Datum:
- Duur:
Gerelateerde podcastafleveringen
-
/https%3A//image.simplecastcdn.com/images/4105a47a-42e5-4ccc-887a-832af7989986/23965394-f5e4-4fdb-b150-639f4910353e/3000x3000/nyt-hf-album-art-3000-2.jpg%3Faid%3Drss_feed)
OpenAI’s Two-Week Pause + Jill Lepore on the Threat of the “Artificial State” + Train of Thought
-
Zuckerberg’s Anti-Doom Fantasy + Finally an A.I. Detector That Works + A.I. Math
-
The White House’s Secret A.I. Rules + The State of Model Alignment With METR’s Chris Painter + The Final Hot Mess Express
-
Open Model Wars + Claire Stapleton's Dishy Google Memoir + Substack's Slop Fight
-
OpenAI Models Go Rogue + Kimi K3 Freakout + A.I. Superforecasting
Meer afleveringen van Hard Fork
-
Meta Shifts the Blame + Do Data Center Bans Work? + The Final HatGPT
This week, Meta agreed to pay up to $17.1 billion and make major changes to Facebook and Instagram over claims it endangered children with addictive social media platforms. We discuss why it capitulated and what it means for the entire... -
OpenAI’s Two-Week Pause + Jill Lepore on the Threat of the “Artificial State” + Train of Thought
This week, we learned that OpenAI had stopped training new artificial intelligence models while the company reviewed its security measures. Will this encourage other labs to hit the brakes too? Then, the historian Jill Lepore joins to... -
Zuckerberg’s Anti-Doom Fantasy + Finally an A.I. Detector That Works + A.I. Math
This week we’re talking about Mark Zuckerberg’s latest essay, “The Future Is for Everyone,” which outlines his positive new vision about the potential of A.I. But do we think it’s credible? Then, Pangram’s chief executive, Max Spero,...